Marta Lorenz

In this Brazilian reincarnation case, a child recalled the life of a person who committed suicide, having pledged to return as the daughter of a close friend, who was in fact the child’s mother. Most of her many statements were lost, but enough were recorded to make this a rich case.

Reincarnation Belief in Brazil

Ian Stevenson observes that Brazil probably holds the strongest belief in reincarnation of all western nations, thanks to the dual influence of African animism and French spiritism, founded by  Allan Kardec in the nineteenth century.  In this climate, parents tend to be accepting of children who remember past lives.1

Sinhá de Oliveiro

Maria Januaria de Oliveiro, known more often as Sinhá or Sinházinha, was born in about 1890, the daughter of a prosperous rancher in the southernmost province of Brazil.  She reportedly loved the rural life, but also liked to visit her friend Ida Lorenz, wife of the schoolteacher Francisco V Lorenz, in the nearby village of Dom Feliciano.

Sinhá twice fell in love with men of whom her father disapproved, one of whom committed suicide when he was prevented from marrying her. She became depressed and suicidal herself, trying to catch cold by going out unsuitably dressed in cold weather.  An infection of the larynx spread to her lungs, turning into tuberculosis from which she died.

On her deathbed, Sinhá told Ida Lorenz she wanted to die, but promised Ida that she would be reborn as her daughter. ‘When reborn and at an age when I can speak on the mystery of rebirth in the body of the little girl who will be your daughter’, she said, ‘I shall relate many things of my present life, and thus you will recognize the truth’.2  Prior to death a day later, her voice weakened to the point where she could only speak in a faint whisper.  Sinhá died in October 1917 at the age of 28.

Marta Lorenz

About ten months later, on August 14, 1918, Marta was born to Ida Lorenz.  According to a published account by her father, Francisco V Lorenz, she first mentioned her past life to her elder sister Lola when asking to be carried on Lola’s back. ‘When I was big and you were small’, she said, ‘I used to carry you often’.3

Lorenz recorded some 120 separate statements about the life of her claimed previous person, Sinhá de Oliveiro, and recognitions of persons known to Sinhá. Had they been kept, this would have made the case the best documented in existence, but they were unfortunately discarded. His account, based on memory, was published as part of a 1946 book about a case of apparent Egyptian xenoglossy.4  However he omitted many items remembered by other family members.


Lorenz passed away in 1957, but his son Waldomiro Lorenz remained interested in Marta’s case and in that of her younger brother Paulo Lorenz. Waldomiro collected statements from Marta that were remembered by other family members prior to 1962, when Stevenson visited Brazil.  He had learned about both cases through correspondence with Waldomiro.

Stevenson spent five days investigating the cases of Marta and Paulo. His Portuguese was sufficient to understand the answers but he also used two interpreters, one of whom was Waldomiro Lorenz.  He interviewed Marta, now aged 44, as well as three of her brothers, three sisters and two foster sisters, all of whom had been older children or young adults when Marta was small.  He also interviewed a surviving sister of Sinhá.

In subsequent years, Stevenson corresponded with Waldomiro, particularly concerning the suicide of his and Marta’s younger brother Paulo.  In 1972, Stevenson travelled to Brazil and visited Marta for a further interview.

Stevenson published the case of Marta Lorenz in his book Twenty Cases Suggestive of Reincarnation,5 from which all information in this article is sourced except where otherwise noted.

Statements and Recognitions

Stevenson tabulates 28 early childhood statements and recognitions by Marta that were verified by current-life and past-life relatives. Some are as follows:

  • at Sinhá’s home there were cows, oxen, oranges and ‘goats that were not goats’ (she stated this at the age of two and a half, before she knew the word for ‘sheep’)
  • her names were Sinhá, Maria and one other (when asked ‘Was it Januaria?’ she answered ‘yes’)
  • Sinhá’s father had been older than Marta’s was now; he had a beard and talked gruffly (she could imitate him well)
  • recognition of Sinhá’s father, stroking his beard and saying ‘Hello, papa’, when she was less than a year old
  • he had a female Negro cook and a Negro servant boy he beat; once Sinhá tried to intervene when the boy cried for help
  • recognition of one of the sweethearts Sinhá’s father had forbidden her to marry
  • when Ida Lorenz came to visit, Sinhá would make coffee and wait in front of the house, playing a phonograph that she placed on a stone to welcome her
  • she described Sinhá’s manner of speaking as she was about to die (known only to Ida Lorenz)
  • Sinhá had contracted her fatal illness during a trip to a city where there were many masqueraders (Marta’s father verified that it was to the city of Pelotas during Carnival time); on the way home the family was caught in a heavy rain and had to spend the night in an old home
  • recognition of Francisca de Oliveira as Sinhá’s cousin and godchild
  • Sinhá had a white horse that was called ‘barroso’ (clay-coloured)
  • Sinhá had a white cat
  • Sinhá had given Carlos Lorenz, her godson, two cows before she died; they both bore calves after her death and before Marta’s birth (an apparent intermission memory)6
  • Sinhá’s funeral was attended by many Negroes but few white women, including Ida Lorenz (they stayed away out of fear of contracting tuberculosis), and Marta’s father had attended Sinhá’s funeral (additiona apparent intermission memories)
  • recognition of a clock in the house of Sinhá’s father, which she said had her full name engraved on the back (which was correct)

Stevenson noted that while the two families knew each other, and Marta’s mother had been very close to Sinhá, some of the facts Marta gave were unknown to her father, such as Sinhá trying to stop her father beating the servant boy, and the heavy rain that forced the family to seek shelter after the visit to Pelotas.  Others, such as the clock bearing her name, were unknown to anyone in the Lorenz family.


As a young child, Marta frequently asked to be taken to Sinhá’s home.  Her father did not do so until she was twelve and no longer speaking spontaneously about her past life, having stopped doing so between the ages of seven and ten.

Marta, Stevenson writes, identified as Sinhá completely, ‘along a line of continuous development, not as a substitution for her identity as Marta’.7  She usually prefaced her memories with ‘when I was Sinhá’, or ‘when I was big’.  She became angry if anyone mistreated her brother Carlos, because he had been a favourite of Sinhá’s, and Sinhá’s godson.  The identification did not lessen as she grew up.  As an adult she yearned for a reunion with Florinzho, the man who had committed suicide when he could not marry her.

She was also keenly aware of the continuity of identity from life to life.  As young child she contradicted a person who said the dead never return. To another, she declared the dead do not stay in their graves.

Associates of Marta noticed a similarity between her handwriting and Sinhá’s, though it was never independently evaluated.  Observations of a facial resemblance were largely discounted by Stevenson, since the observers all knew about the apparent reincarnation. He gave credence to only one claim of this kind: an elderly woman, a servant of the Oliviero family, with whom Marta had never discussed her memories, declared, ‘This girl looks like Sinhá’.

Marta suffered physical ailments that particularly affected her larynx and that bore resemblance to Sinhá’s death by tuberculosis.  Prior to age ten, she contracted frequent upper respiratory infections, causing her voice to become harsh.  She recalled these occurring about once a month, causing hoarseness and throat pain.  At such times she felt large in her body and believed she would die, the disease apparently triggering past-life associations.

Witnesses who knew both Sinhá and Marta observed similarities of personality, such as fondness for cats, love of dancing, fear of rain (which Marta herself said was carried over), and a strong phobia of blood.


Both Sinhá and Marta were known to have unusual powers of extrasensory perception.  Sinhá demonstrated it most impressively when, as often happened, she announced that her friend Ida Lorenz was coming to visit, before this was known.

Two of Marta’s siblings recalled that she was able to know the title of a book she had been given before she unwrapped it.  At the age of five or six, Marta had a night-time vision of a girl named Celica, who had either been a close friend or relative of Sinhá, calling to her, ‘Sinhá, Sinhá’.  Marta’s father noted the time, and found it corresponded precisely with the time of death of a girl named Celica who lived about 15 miles away.  Neither Marta nor anyone around her could have had knowledge of her death through normal means.

Interestingly, as Stevenson recounts in another work, Sinhá was said to have once manifested as a spirit after Marta was born.  While she was still an infant, prior to any mention on her part of a past life, an attempt made to contact Sinhá via a medium.  Those present testified that Sinhá communicated, but only tersely: ‘Don’t call me up.  I have reincarnated!’8 

Stevenson notes that Marta’s clear ESP abilities raise the possibility that she gained her apparent past-life knowledge by psychically reading the thoughts of others.  However, he notes that ESP would not explain the degree and persistence, often over many years, of identification with another person demonstrated in cases such as Marta’s,9 nor the specialized skills that apparently carry over in some reincarnation cases (though Paulo Lorenz’s case demonstrates this better than Marta’s).10

Further, Stevenson contends in Twenty Cases, ESP as an explanation for apparent reincarnation cases does not explain the experiences of children who, unlike Marta, show no other evidence of ESP ability.  He argues that there is no apparent motive for people who apparently remember a past life to sustain the identification over a long period of time, and that, outside of reincarnation cases, there is no evidence to suggest that parents are able to psychically impose an alter identity on a child.  Finally, he notes that in many rich reincarnation cases, the current and previous families had no association with or knowledge of each other at all prior to the child giving accurate statements, making an ESP explanation doubtful.11

Later Development

In 1972, Stevenson learned from Marta that the state of her past-life memories had not much changed in the ten years since he had seen her last. He came to feel that she still remembered more than he had previously thought.  She seemed to remember particularly well details associated with Florinzho, her last love, with whom she had in effect performed a double suicide.  Her first two sons both died in infancy, and she believed they had both been attempts by Florinzho to reincarnate, from her observation that birthmarks on their heads corresponded with ones he had had.

She continued to think of herself as Sinhá and Marta both, and retained the same personality traits and health problems.  She had attacks of bronchitis about four times per year, losing her voice each time.  Stevenson calls this susceptibility ‘a kind of “internal birthmark” related to the previous life and death’.12

Marta was so disturbed by the suicide of her brother Paulo in 1966 that she entered a hospital for more than three weeks, and had not fully recovered by Stevenson’s visit in 1972.  In 1969 she lost Carlos, Sinhá’s godson, and was still tearful remembering him three years later.

Marta revealed to Stevenson that she still maintained something of Sinhá’s suicidal tendency; she had never actually attempted it, but admitted that she had often wished to die, and might have killed herself at times if she had had a gun.

Now middle-aged, she felt that her previous and current life were roughly equal in degree of happiness. Stevenson himself observed that this time around Marta Lorenz enjoyed a blessing she had been denied last time: a loving husband.

Karen Wehrstein


Stevenson, I (1974). Twenty Cases Suggestive of Reincarnation (2nd ed., rev.). Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.

Stevenson, I (1980). Cases of the Reincarnation Type. Vol. III: Twelve Cases in Lebanon and Turkey. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.

Stevenson, I (1997).  Reincarnation and Biology: A Contribution to the Etiology of Birthmarks and Birth Defects. Volume 1: Birthmarks. Westport, Connecticut, USA: Praeger.


  • 1. Stevenson (1974), pp. 181-2.
  • 2. Stevenson (1974), p. 183.
  • 3. Lorenz (1946) cited by Stevenson (1974), p. 184.
  • 4. Lorenz, FV (1946), A Voz de Antigo Egito. Rio de Janeiro: Federação Espirita Basileira.  See Stevenson (1974), p. 183 fn4.
  • 5. Stevenson (1974), pp. 181-203.
  • 6. For detailed information about intermission memories in reincarnation cases, read James G. Matlock’s relevant article here:
  • 7. Stevenson (1974), p. 187.
  • 8. Stevenson (1980), p. 256.
  • 9. See Stevenson (1974), pp. 357-61.
  • 10. See Stevenson (1974), p. 372.
  • 11. See Stevenson (1974), pp. 372-3 for his summary of objections to ESP as an explanation, as he had developed them by then.
  • 12. Stevenson (1974), p. 201.