Dermo-Optical Perception

The phenomenon commonly known as dermo-optical perception (DOP) refers to the apparent ability to discern the colour of a stimulus object purely on the basis of touch, that is, without any visual access to the object. To the extent that one cannot literally ‘see’  with the fingertips the term perhaps is inapt. In part for this reason, the phenomenon also has variously been dubbed aphotic digital colour sensing, nonvisual colour perception, paroptic vision, cutaneous perception of colour, and eyeless sight;1 however, for convenience the popular term DOP will be used here.

This entry is a slightly revised version of a section of a paper by Irwin the Australian Journal of Parapsychology and is reproduced here with the permission of the editor.2

History

Cases of apparent DOP have long been reported; for example, a case in the seventeenth century was described by the scientist Robert Boyle and by the novelist Jonathan Swift.3  Indeed, in the mid-1960s Liddle4 noted that over fifty cases had been recorded in some 140 years and eight different countries. Apart from the pioneering work of Jules Romains5 the modern experimental study of DOP appears to date from the early 1960s.6 A Russian woman, Rosa Kuleshova, was reported by a neuropathologist Dr Goldberg to be able to discern colours simply by ‘feeling’ them, and eventually she was tested formally by researchers in the Laboratory of Psychology at the Nizhny Tagil Pedagogical [teachers’ training] Institute7 and later at the Biophysics Institute of the Soviet Academy in Moscow.8

Accounts of these observations were reported in the popular press in the West, and soon many people came forward to assert that they, too, had the ability of DOP. Some of these claimants proved to be frauds and some subsequently confessed to fraudulent activity.9 Thus, there were some grounds for the assertion by the inveterate debunker Martin Gardner10  that ‘successful’ DOP performance could be attributed wholly to the experimenter’s use of poorly fitting blindfolds and a ‘peek down the nose’ by participants. The generality of Gardner’s account nevertheless was vigorously challenged11 although sceptical commentators still cite Gardner’s explanation as definitive.12

Testing

Since the mid-1960s a number of people have been tested for DOP under increasingly rigorous experimental conditions; for example, participants have been screened from the coloured objects, allowed to touch them only through elasticised sleeves, and have had their head enclosed in a box. Notwithstanding some null findings13 some participants have shown accurate tactile identification of colours well beyond that expected by chance.14 On these grounds practical applications of DOP for blind people have even been mooted15 but to date these proposals have not progressed substantially.

Figures 1 & 2: Experimental apparatus used in some studies by Duplessis (1975).

Source: thegiarettas.blogspot.com.au

Copyright: Susan MacWilliam

photograph showing experimental apparatus used in some studies by Duplessis (1975)         photograph of experimental apparatus used in some studies by Duplessis (1975)

Explanations

Although a growing number of psychologists now concede there is a phenomenon here to be explained,16 there remains a lack of consensus on the actual nature of DOP.  Successful DOP performance has been observed even when participants are kept in complete darkness,17 so it would seem the effect is not mediated by radiation within the normal visible spectrum.18 Some commentators19 have noted, however, that coloured objects may vary in their infra-red emissions and thus it is possible people may learn to use thermal sensors in the fingers to distinguish different colours by touch; indeed, some experimental evidence has been educed in support of this viewpoint.20

A popular alternative view, according to Berger and Berger21 is that the phenomenon has an extrasensory basis. The Bergers add, however, that an experiment by Nash22 appears to rule out an extrasensory account. In Nash’s study DOP performance was significant when participants could touch the coloured stimulus card but not when the card was covered with a thick sheet of glass. Nash held that if esp was involved, performance would have been significant also in the plate-glass condition. This rejection of the extrasensory account nevertheless relies on a null result for its substantiation. Indeed, Nash’s findings may be accommodated under an appeal to some anomalous characteristic of experimental esp such as the parapsychological experimenter effect or the differential effect.23 Thus, the evidence against an extrasensory theory of the phenomenon is perhaps equivocal. In addition, DOP has also been found even when the target objects are enclosed in a cardboard or aluminium-foil envelope and the participants can only lay their hand above the envelope;24 for all practical purposes cardboard and aluminium would normally prevent the passage of infra-red radiation.25

There are some grounds, therefore, for proposing that DOP is a paranormal phenomenon akin to extrasensory perception (esp), and it may well be the case that the procedure of DOP tests is essentially psi-conducive, albeit to an exceptionally potent degree it would seem.

Harvey J Irwin

Literature

Abram S. Novomeysky. (n.d.). Retrieved 09:46, December 18, 2014 from http://novomeysky.genealogia.ru/papa/papae.htm

Benski, C., Raphel, C., Stivalet, P., Cian, C., Esquivié, D.,

Buguet, A., Masson, P., & Viret, J. (1998). Testing new claims of dermo-optical perception. Skeptical Inquirer, 22, 21-26.

Berger, A. S., & Berger, J. (1991). The encyclopedia of parapsychology and psychical research. New York: Paragon House.

Brugger, P., & Weiss, P. H. (2008). Dermo-optical perception: The non-synesthetic ‘palpability of colors’. A comment on Larner (2006). Journal of the History of the Neurosciences: Basic and Clinical Perspectives, 17, 253-255.

Buckhout, R. (1965). The blind fingers. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 20, 191-194.

Dermo-optical perception. (2014, August 10). In Wikipedia: The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 00:26, November 30, 2014, from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dermo-optical_perception&oldid=620670886

Duplessis, Y. (1975). The Paranormal Perception of Color. New York: Parapsychology Foundation.

Duplessis, Y. (1985). Dermo-optical sensitivity and perception: Its influence on human behavior. Biosocial Research, 7, 76-93.

Duplessis, Y., & Novomeysky, A. S. (1981). The influence of invisible radiation of colored materials on human behavior and psychical activity. International Journal of Paraphysics, 15(Nos. 1 & 2), 3-19.

Engineering Rules [pseudonym]. (n.d.). Can infra-red light penetrate through aluminium foil?  Retrieved December 6, 2014 from https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20060709035141AAvAefM

Gardner, M. (1966). Dermo-optical perception: A peek down the nose. Science, 151 (no. 3711), 654-657.

Gardner, M. (2003). Eyeless vision. In Are Universes Thicker than Blackberries? (pp. 225-243). New York: Norton. (Original work published 1996)

How can you block infrared waves? (2015). Retrieved June 20, 2015 from https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090120211824AAEMaDz

Irwin, H. J. (2015). Thinking style and the formation of paranormal belief and disbelief. Australian Journal of Parapsychology, 15, 121-139.

Irwin, H. J., & Watt, C. A. (2007).  An introduction to parapsychology (5th ed.).  Jefferson, N.C.:  McFarland.

Ivanov, A. (1964). Soviet experiments in ‘eye-less vision’. International Journal of Parapsychology, 6(1), 1-23.

Jacobson, J. Z., Frost, B. J., & King, W. L. (1966). A case of dermooptical perception. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 22, 515-520.

Kaiser, P. K. (1983). Nonvisual color perception: A critical review. Color Research and Application, 8, 137-144.

Keene, M. L. (1976). The psychic mafia. New York: Dell.

Larner, A. J. (2006). A possible account of synaesthesia dating from the seventeenth century. Journal of the History of the Neurosciences, 15, 245-249.

Liddle, D. (1964). Fingertip sight: Fact or fiction? Discovery: Journal of Science, 25(9), 22-26 & 49.

Makous, W. L. (1966). Cutaneous color sensitivity: Explanation and demonstration. Psychological Review, 73, 280-294.

Nash, C. B. (1971). Cutaneous perception of color with a head box. Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research, 65, 83-87.

Nickell, J. (2005). Second sight: The phenomenon of eyeless vision. Skeptical Inquirer, 29(3), 18-20.

Ostrander, L., & Schroeder, S. (1970). Psychic discoveries behind the Iron Curtain. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Passini, R., & Rainville, C. (1992). The dermo-optical perception of color as an information source for blind travelers. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 75, 995-1010.

Razran, G. (1966). Dermo-optical perception of human extraocular color sensitivity: A clarification of current soviet research and an article in science. Soviet Psychology, 5(1), 4-13.

Romains, J. (1924).  Eyeless Sight: A Study of Extra-Retinal Vision and the ParopticSsense. London: Putnam’s. (Original work published in French 1920)

Shiah, Y. (2008). The finger-reading effect with children: Two unsuccessful replications. Journal of Parapsychology, 72(1), 109-132.

What common materials can effectively block infrared radiation? (2012, November 4). Retrieved December 18, 2014 from http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/43389/what-common-materials-can-effectively-block-infrared-radiation

Youtz, R. P. (1964). Aphotic digital color sensing. American Psychologist, 19, 734.

Youtz, R. P. (1966, May 20). Dermo-optical perception: Letter. Science, 153(3725), 1108.

Zavala, A., van Cott, H. P., Orr, D. B., & Small, V. H. (1967). Human dermo-optical perception: Colors of objects and of projected light differentiated with fingers. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 25, 525-542.

References

  • 1. ‘Dermo-optical perception’, 2014.
  • 2. Irwin, 2015.
  • 3. Brugger & Weiss, 2008; Larner, 2006.
  • 4. Liddle, 1964, p. 24.
  • 5. 1920/1924, pseudonym of French poet and writer Louis Farigoule.
  • 6. for reviews see Berger & Berger, 1991; Duplessis, 1975; Gardner, 1996/2003; Liddle, 1964.
  • 7. ‘Abram S. Novomeysky’, n.d.
  • 8. Ostrander & Schroeder, 1970.
  • 9. Keene, 1976.
  • 10. Gardner, 1966.
  • 11. Razran, 1966; Youtz, 1966.
  • 12. e.g., Nickell, 2005.
  • 13. e.g., Benski et al., 1998; Buckhout, 1965; Shiah, 2008.
  • 14. e.g., Duplessis, 1985; Duplessis & Novomeysky, 1981; Jacobson, Frost, & King, 1966; Makous, 1966; Nash, 1971; Zavala, van Cott, Orr, & Small, 1967.
  • 15. e.g., Brugger & Weiss, 2008; Duplessis, 1975; Passini & Rainville, 1992; Romains, 1920/1924.
  • 16. Brugger & Weiss, 2008.
  • 17. e.g., Duplessis & Novomeysky, 1981; Youtz, 1964.
  • 18. but see Ivanov, 1964.
  • 19. e.g., Kaiser, 1983.
  • 20. Makous, 1966.
  • 21. 1991, p. 103.
  • 22. Nash 1971.
  • 23. for general descriptions of these effects see Irwin & Watt, 2007.
  • 24. e.g., Duplessis & Novomeysky, 1981. Despite these findings Duplessis herself preferred the infra-red explanation of DOP.
  • 25. Engineering Rules, n.d.; ‘How can you block infrared waves?’, 2015; ‘What common materials can effectively block infrared radiation?’, 2012.